SHRI GANESH BAHUUDESHIYA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, MOGRA, THR. PRESIDENT AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3670/2026

Case under The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040147332026

Filing Number

WP/10004/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3670/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009 Section 226
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI GANESH BAHUUDESHIYA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, MOGRA, THR. PRESIDENT AND ANOTHER

    Adv. HRISHIKESH S CHITALEY,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR, ,ABHINAV PRASHANT VYAS,SANKET MANOJ JOSHI,HARSHAD H. JICHKAR,ABHIMANYU MENON,REWATI S. CHITALEY,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR

  2. 2.THE LITTLE FLOWER ENGLISH SCHOOL, LAKHANI, BHANDARA, THR ITS PRINCIPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA PRATHMIK SHIKSHAN PARISHAD, THR ITS DIRECTOR, MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF PRIMARY EDUCATION, PUNE

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, PUNE

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, NAGPUR

  6. 6.THE EDUCATION OFFICER, (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, BHANDARA

  7. 7.THE UNION OF INDIA, THR ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE, DELHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-May-2026

    —

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/3670/2026 The Nagpur High Court disposed of the petition by two private schools seeking outstanding fee reimbursements for students admitted under the 25% RTE quota. Following similar precedent decisions, the court directed authorities to scrutinize the petitioners' eligibility within four weeks and determine the reimbursement quantum; if eligible, payment must follow within twelve weeks, or else reasons for non-entitlement must be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3670/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/3670/2026 The Nagpur High Court disposed of the petition by two private schools seeking outstanding fee reimbursements for students admitted under the 25% RTE quota. Following similar precedent decisions, the court directed authorities to scrutinize the petitioners' eligibility within four weeks and determine the reimbursement quantum; if eligible, payment must follow within twelve weeks, or else reasons for non-entitlement must be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case