RAVINDRA VITTHALRAO NIMBOLKAR vs STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SKILL, EMPLOYMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION AND ORS — WP/2553/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040146942025
Next Hearing
24th May 2025
Filing Number
WP/10756/2025
Filing Date
03-05-2025
Registration No
WP/2553/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVINDRA VITTHALRAO NIMBOLKAR
Adv. N.S. WARULKAR,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA, ,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SKILL, EMPLOYMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION AND ORS
DIRECTORATE OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
SURAJ SHRIKRUSHNA HATAGALE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS
FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS
FOR ORDERS --
FOR ORDERS --
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-05-2025 | |
| 27-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS ARISING OUT OF ORDER OF TRIBUNALS |
| 22-08-2025 | FOR ORDERS -- |
| 16-07-2025 | FOR ORDERS -- |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/2553/2025 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's rejection of the petitioner's candidacy for the Assistant Store Keeper position reserved for Project Affected Persons (PAP). The court held that eligibility must be acquired on or before the application deadline and cannot be satisfied by documents obtained thereafter. Key Reasoning: The petitioner lacked a valid PAP certificate in his name at application submission (01/2024) and document verification (01/2024); he only received his own PAP certificate on 09/02/2024, after the merit list publication. Additionally, the certificate initially submitted belonged to his father, which does not confer eligibility to the petitioner. The court established that recruitment advertisement requirements are inflexible and must be satisfied on the prescribed date to prevent fraud on public employment principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/2553/2025 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's rejection of the petitioner's candidacy for the Assistant Store Keeper position reserved for Project Affected Persons (PAP). The court held that eligibility must be acquired on or before the application deadline and cannot be satisfied by documents obtained thereafter. Key Reasoning: The petitioner lacked a valid PAP certificate in his name at application submission (01/2024) and document verification (01/2024); he only received his own PAP certificate on 09/02/2024, after the merit list publication. Additionally, the certificate initially submitted belonged to his father, which does not confer eligibility to the petitioner. The court established that recruitment advertisement requirements are inflexible and must be satisfied on the prescribed date to prevent fraud on public employment principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts