UTKARSH DNYANPEETH ENGLISH SCHOOL KAWATHA, THR. PRESIDENT SAU. LEENA SUBHASH SHEGOKAR, BULDHANA vs STATE OF MAH., THR. SECY., DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDU., MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3672/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040145382026

Filing Number

WP/9861/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3672/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UTKARSH DNYANPEETH ENGLISH SCHOOL KAWATHA, THR. PRESIDENT SAU. LEENA SUBHASH SHEGOKAR, BULDHANA

    Adv. ABHAY SHRIKRISHNA DHAGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAH., THR. SECY., DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDU., MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE MAHARASHTRA PRATHAMIK SHIKSHAN PARISHAD, THR. DIRECTOR, MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF PRIMARY EDUCATION, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, PUNE

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, PUNE

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR

  6. 6.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA

  7. 7.THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI, AKOLA

  8. 8.THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT NEW DELHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-May-2026

    —

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court directed the State authorities to scrutinize Utkarsh Dnyapeeth English School's claim for reimbursement of fees for students admitted under the 25% RTE quota within four weeks and determine its eligibility. If entitled, reimbursement must be made within twelve weeks; if not entitled, reasons for denial must be communicated within two weeks, following similar precedent decisions on RTE fee reimbursement claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3672/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court directed the State authorities to scrutinize Utkarsh Dnyapeeth English School's claim for reimbursement of fees for students admitted under the 25% RTE quota within four weeks and determine its eligibility. If entitled, reimbursement must be made within twelve weeks; if not entitled, reasons for denial must be communicated within two weeks, following similar precedent decisions on RTE fee reimbursement claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case