LAXMAN MOTIRAM CHOUDHARI AND OTHERS vs RAMESH AWADHOOTRAO THAKRE AND OTHERS Advocate - P R AGRAWAL, ,AASTHA RAKESH SHARMA,SHREYA HARISH BHAGAT,(FOR R — HCBM40144602026

Case under Mamlatdars Courts Act 1906 Section 226, 227.

CNR: HCBM040144602026

Filing Number

WP/9814/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mamlatdars Courts Act 1906 Section 226, 227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAXMAN MOTIRAM CHOUDHARI AND OTHERS

    Adv. HARSHAL M. BOBADE

  2. 2.ASHOK TULSHIRAM CHOUDHARI

  3. 3.BAL TULSHIRAM CHOUDHARI

  4. 4.LAHU RAMRAO CHOUDHARI

  5. 5.VINOD RAMRAO CHOUDHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH AWADHOOTRAO THAKRE AND OTHERS Advocate - P R AGRAWAL, ,AASTHA RAKESH SHARMA,SHREYA HARISH BHAGAT,(FOR R

  2. 2.NAIB TAHSILDAR, TIOSA, AMRAVATI

  3. 3.SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIOSA, AMRAVATI

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    Case Summary In Writ Petition No. 9814 of 2026 before the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court, no petitioner's counsel appeared on the hearing date of 15th June 2026. The court granted a two-week adjournment to remove office objections against the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Writ Petition No. 9814 of 2026 before the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court, no petitioner's counsel appeared on the hearing date of 15th June 2026. The court granted a two-week adjournment to remove office objections against the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case