MANISHA CHAITRAM UMREDKAR (AFTER MARRIAGE NAME SAU. MANISHA LILADHAR NAGARDHANKAR) vs S.T. CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, NAGPUR THR. VICE CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER — CAW/1060/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040143342026
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
Filing Number
CAW/9735/2026
Filing Date
23-04-2026
Registration No
CAW/1060/2026
Registration Date
28-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
--C.A. Disposed off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANISHA CHAITRAM UMREDKAR (AFTER MARRIAGE NAME SAU. MANISHA LILADHAR NAGARDHANKAR)
Adv. DIGVIJAY PRAKASH SINGH
Respondent(s)
S.T. CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, NAGPUR THR. VICE CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee's application seeking extension of time to comply with a December 2025 court order, as the Committee had already adjudicated the petitioner's caste claim on 03.06.2026, rendering the relief sought infructuous. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee's application seeking extension of time to comply with a December 2025 court order, as the Committee had already adjudicated the petitioner's caste claim on 03.06.2026, rendering the relief sought infructuous. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts