BHUPAL S/O PANNALAL DONGAONKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, BULDHANA AND OTHERS — CAW/1010/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040140992026

Filing Number

CAW/9580/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CAW/1010/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUPAL S/O PANNALAL DONGAONKAR

    Adv. MANISH RAJENDRA JOHARAPURKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, BULDHANA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    —

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court allowed applications for condonation of delay, setting aside of abatement, and substitution of the petitioner's legal heirs on record. The original petitioner Bhupal Dongaonkar died on 21.8.2024, and his legal heirs in Pune, initially unaware of the pending petition, subsequently approached counsel and filed these applications. The court, finding no objection from respondents, permitted the legal heirs to be substituted within two weeks and scheduled the petition for hearing after vacations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAW/1010/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court allowed applications for condonation of delay, setting aside of abatement, and substitution of the petitioner's legal heirs on record. The original petitioner Bhupal Dongaonkar died on 21.8.2024, and his legal heirs in Pune, initially unaware of the pending petition, subsequently approached counsel and filed these applications. The court, finding no objection from respondents, permitted the legal heirs to be substituted within two weeks and scheduled the petition for hearing after vacations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case