BABURAO YADAV WANJARE AND OTHERS vs RAJUSINGH DHANSINGH RATHOD AND OTHERS — CRA/70/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040140732026

Filing Number

CRA/9564/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRA/70/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115
Maharashtra Land Revenue (Disposal of Govt. Land) Rule 1977

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABURAO YADAV WANJARE AND OTHERS

    Adv. JAIDEEP J. CHANDURKAR

  2. 2.BANDU SHRAWAN WANJARE

  3. 3.EKNATH SHRAWAN WANJARE

  4. 4.TANIBAI SHRAWAN WANJARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJUSINGH DHANSINGH RATHOD AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR, YAVATMAL

  3. 3.TAHSILDAR, PUSAD, YAVATMAL

  4. 4.SITARAM YADAV WANJARE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA 70/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 3rd July 2026 in the civil revision application filed by Baburao Yadav Wanjare and others against Rajusingh Dhansingh Rathod and others. The court granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause 2, with the State's advocate general waiving service of notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 (State). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA 70/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents returnable on 3rd July 2026 in the civil revision application filed by Baburao Yadav Wanjare and others against Rajusingh Dhansingh Rathod and others. The court granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause 2, with the State's advocate general waiving service of notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 (State). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case