SHESHRAO DHONDUBA DIGHOLE AND OTHERS vs THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORP. LIMITED, YAVATMAL FOREST PROJECT DIVISION AND ORS. — WP/3616/2026
Case under Service Matter Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040140702026
Filing Number
WP/9563/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/3616/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHESHRAO DHONDUBA DIGHOLE AND OTHERS
Adv. BHUSHAN DAFLE
-
2.TEJRAO SHRIRAM SAWADATKAR
-
3.SAHEBRAO LAXMANRAO THORAT
-
4.RAJU SONAJI GAWAI
-
5.ASHOK NIRANJAN JADHAV
-
6.SANTOSH MAROTRAO RAJURKAR
-
7.SEVA MERCHAND JADHAV
-
8.PRABHU BALIRAM SARODE
-
9.ASHOK BALIRAM INGLE
-
10.MAHADEO SHALIKRAM TALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORP. LIMITED, YAVATMAL FOREST PROJECT DIVISION AND ORS.
-
2.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED NAGPUR
-
3.REGIONAL MANAGER, FOREST, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, YAVATMAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
—
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by forest laborers seeking directions for regularization and salary arrears under a 2012 Government Resolution. The court held that regularization claims are not maintainable before a writ court and must be pursued before the competent Industrial Court instead, directing petitioners to approach the appropriate forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3616/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by forest laborers seeking directions for regularization and salary arrears under a 2012 Government Resolution. The court held that regularization claims are not maintainable before a writ court and must be pursued before the competent Industrial Court instead, directing petitioners to approach the appropriate forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts