M/S PRIME LOGISTICS, THR. PROPRIETOR, YASIR AMIN KHARWA vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST AND C. EX., DIV-KALMESHWAR, NAGPUR-II AND ORS. — WP/2484/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040140362025

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/10281/2025

Filing Date

28-04-2025

Registration No

WP/2484/2025

Registration Date

05-05-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227
Central Excises Act
Cenvat Credit Rules

Petitioner(s)

M/S PRIME LOGISTICS, THR. PROPRIETOR, YASIR AMIN KHARWA

Adv. ABHISHEK KIRAN NAIK

Respondent(s)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST AND C. EX., DIV-KALMESHWAR, NAGPUR-II AND ORS.

Adv. SHRADDHA KAPOOR 1123

COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CGST AND C. EX., NAGPUR

JOINT COMMISSIONER CGST AND C. EX., NAGPUR-II

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

24-05-2025
12-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION-TAX MATTERS

17-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION-TAX MATTERS

27-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION-TAX MATTERS

06-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION-TAX MATTERS

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE,HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

The writ petition filed by M/s Prime Logistics against CGST authorities was heard on 17th April, 2026 before a two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The case has been adjourned for the next hearing on 12th June, 2026, with both petitioner and respondent counsel present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition filed by M/s Prime Logistics against CGST authorities was heard on 17th April, 2026 before a two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The case has been adjourned for the next hearing on 12th June, 2026, with both petitioner and respondent counsel present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case