RAJU RAMPARAG GUPTA NEELAM YADAV, MANALI JADHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO MOUDA PS DIST NAGPUR RURAL AND OTHERS. — WP/350/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040139452026
e-Filing Number
18-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/4460/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/350/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJU RAMPARAG GUPTA NEELAM YADAV, MANALI JADHAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO MOUDA PS (Police Station) DIST NAGPUR RURAL AND OTHERS.
-
2.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
3.COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE , NAGPUR
-
4.ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, PUNE
-
5.AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE
-
6.GOSEVA AYOG
-
7.MAHARASHTRA ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD
-
8.COMMITTEE TO MONITOR ANIMAL WELFARE LAWS IN MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh (Criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
-
15-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF
Case Summary: The petitioner sought directions to register an FIR against accused persons under the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act. The petition was adjourned as the petitioner failed to appear before the court. The bench noted that an alternate remedy is available and directed the petitioner to establish the maintainability of the writ petition when the matter is relisted after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/350/2026
Case Summary: The petitioner sought directions to register an FIR against accused persons under the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act. The petition was adjourned as the petitioner failed to appear before the court. The bench noted that an alternate remedy is available and directed the petitioner to establish the maintainability of the writ petition when the matter is relisted after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts