THE A.P.M.C., NAGPUR, THR. SOIL TESTING OFFICER (I/C) LEGAL SECTION, SHIVRAJ R. BHUSE AND ANR. vs THE DIVISIONAL JT. REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ANR. — WP/3929/2026
Case under Ma. Agri. Products Marketing Act 1964 Section 226,227. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040138392026
Filing Number
WP/9408/2026
Filing Date
20-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/3929/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE A.P.M.C., NAGPUR, THR. SOIL TESTING OFFICER (I/C) LEGAL SECTION, SHIVRAJ R. BHUSE AND ANR.
Adv. A.M. GHARE,ONKAR A. GHARE,ONKAR A. GHARE, ,ONKAR A. GHARE
-
2.SHRI. AHMADBHAI S/O KARIMBHAI SHEIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DIVISIONAL JT. REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ANR.
-
2.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD, PUNE, THR. GENERAL MANAGER
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
03-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/3929/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition challenging an order dated 26.02.2026 that directed cancellation of 20 shops allotted to licensed brokers of APMC, Nagpur. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 18th June 2026 and directed parties to maintain status quo until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3929/2026
Case Summary: WP/3929/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition challenging an order dated 26.02.2026 that directed cancellation of 20 shops allotted to licensed brokers of APMC, Nagpur. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 18th June 2026 and directed parties to maintain status quo until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts