WASUDEO S/O SHRIKRUSHNA KADU vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL WELFARE, AKOLA AND ORS. — WP/4630/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040137912026

Filing Number

WP/9377/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/4630/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Service Matter
Ashram School Code

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WASUDEO S/O SHRIKRUSHNA KADU

    Adv. SWAPNIL SURESH SHINGANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL WELFARE, AKOLA AND ORS.

  2. 2.SANT DNYANESHWAR BAHUUDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN MANDAL,AKOLA, THR. PRESIDENT

  3. 3.SHRI SIDHHESHWAR PRIMARY ASHRAM SCHOOL,DABHA AKOLA, THR. HEAD MASTER

  4. 4.ENQUIRY COMMITTEE, SANT DNYANESHWAR DAHUUDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN MANDAL, AKOLA THR. CHIEF EXECUTVIE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed petitioner Wasudeo's withdrawal of the writ petition on June 15, 2026. While granting permission for withdrawal, the court kept all issues raised in the petition open for future consideration, meaning the petitioner retains the right to pursue these matters again. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4630/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed petitioner Wasudeo's withdrawal of the writ petition on June 15, 2026. While granting permission for withdrawal, the court kept all issues raised in the petition open for future consideration, meaning the petitioner retains the right to pursue these matters again. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case