ANIL S/O GHANSHYAM SAHARE vs UNION OF INDIA, THR. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF TELECOM COMMUNICATION, NEW DELHI AND ORS. — WP/3831/2026
Case under S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040135302026
Next Hearing
30th July 2026
Filing Number
WP/9221/2026
Filing Date
17-04-2026
Registration No
WP/3831/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIL S/O GHANSHYAM SAHARE
Adv. ASHWIN DESHPANDE,VEDANT H. PANDEY,VEDANT H. PANDEY, ,RASHI RAJU NAGRARE,VEDANT H. PANDEY
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA, THR. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF TELECOM COMMUNICATION, NEW DELHI AND ORS.
THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (INDOOR), AND INQUIRY OFFICER, SRINAGAR
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, THR ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, MUMBAI
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LMT, THR ITS SENIOR GENERAL, MANAGER TELECOM, CHANDRAPUR
THE SCHEDULE TRIBE CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, THR ITS MEMBER SECRETARY AND DEPUTY,NAGPUR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
FRESH ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | |
| 30-07-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/3831/2026 Outcome: The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the petition and issued notice to respondents. Respondents No. 1 and 5 waived service and sought time to file replies, which was granted. The matter was adjourned to 30-07-2026 for further hearing. The petitioner was permitted to serve remaining respondents through all available modes and file an affidavit of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/3831/2026 Outcome: The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the petition and issued notice to respondents. Respondents No. 1 and 5 waived service and sought time to file replies, which was granted. The matter was adjourned to 30-07-2026 for further hearing. The petitioner was permitted to serve remaining respondents through all available modes and file an affidavit of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts