BABLU @ MAHAVIR ASHARFILAL YADAV SHARMA ARVINDKUMAR YOGESHWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY OF HOME DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA MUMBAI — APPW/125/2026

Case under Criminal Law Amendment Act Section 217. Disposed: Contested--C.A. Disposed off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040133872026

e-Filing Number

17-04-2026

Filing Number

APPW/4273/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

APPW/125/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Law Amendment Act Section 217

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABLU @ MAHAVIR ASHARFILAL YADAV SHARMA ARVINDKUMAR YOGESHWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY OF HOME DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA MUMBAI

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    —

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the Criminal Application by correcting clerical errors in the previously issued order dated 15.04.2026 on the Criminal Writ Petition. The court corrected multiple paragraph references (changing 3(d) to 4(d), 3(e) to 4(e)) and directed that the corrected order be uploaded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPW/125/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the Criminal Application by correcting clerical errors in the previously issued order dated 15.04.2026 on the Criminal Writ Petition. The court corrected multiple paragraph references (changing 3(d) to 4(d), 3(e) to 4(e)) and directed that the corrected order be uploaded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case