SARPANCH, GRAM PANCHYAT, SHINDKHED (MORESHWAR) AND ANOTHER vs VIJAY SHRIRAM PARASKAR Advocate - MANGESH V. BUTE, ,ROMA P. BONDADE,(FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/3792/2026

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 226,227. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040133242026

Filing Number

WP/9070/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3792/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARPANCH, GRAM PANCHYAT, SHINDKHED (MORESHWAR) AND ANOTHER

    Adv. PRAMOD N. VARMA

  2. 2.SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT, SINDKHED (MORESHWAR)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY SHRIRAM PARASKAR Advocate - MANGESH V. BUTE, ,ROMA P. BONDADE,(FOR RESPONDENT)

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission-Labour And Industrial

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  3. 23-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 3792/2026 was heard on 05.05.2026 before Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar at the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The Court issued notice to respondent Vijay Shriram Paraskar, with the returnable date fixed as 15.06.2026. The petitioners were permitted to serve the respondent through both regular and private modes of service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 3792/2026 was heard on 05.05.2026 before Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar at the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The Court issued notice to respondent Vijay Shriram Paraskar, with the returnable date fixed as 15.06.2026. The petitioners were permitted to serve the respondent through both regular and private modes of service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case