KRISHNA CHITRANJAN RAUT vs STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY TRIBAL, DEVELOPMENT DEPT./SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3842/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM040132292026

Next Hearing

30th July 2026

Filing Number

WP/8999/2026

Filing Date

16-04-2026

Registration No

WP/3842/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act

Petitioner(s)

KRISHNA CHITRANJAN RAUT

Adv. ANJANA MOTIRAM RAUT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY TRIBAL, DEVELOPMENT DEPT./SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.

CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, YAVATMAL THR. MEMBER SECRETARY

BABASAHEB NAIK COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING PUSAD, YAVATMAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

27-05-2026
30-07-2026

FRESH ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE,HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Case Summary: WP 3842/2026 Krishna Chitranjan Raut's writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others was heard on 11-06-2026. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents and adjourned the matter to 30-07-2026. The government waived service of notice and was granted time to file a reply; the petitioner was permitted to serve the third respondent by all available modes including court notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 3842/2026 Krishna Chitranjan Raut's writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others was heard on 11-06-2026. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents and adjourned the matter to 30-07-2026. The government waived service of notice and was granted time to file a reply; the petitioner was permitted to serve the third respondent by all available modes including court notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act. All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case