KRISHNA CHITRANJAN RAUT vs STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY TRIBAL, DEVELOPMENT DEPT./SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3842/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040132292026
Filing Number
WP/8999/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/3842/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHNA CHITRANJAN RAUT
Adv. ANJANA MOTIRAM RAUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECRETARY TRIBAL, DEVELOPMENT DEPT./SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, YAVATMAL THR. MEMBER SECRETARY
-
3.BABASAHEB NAIK COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING PUSAD, YAVATMAL
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission-Caste Scrutiny Matters
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF
Case Summary: WP 3842/2026 Krishna Chitranjan Raut's writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others was heard on 11-06-2026. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents and adjourned the matter to 30-07-2026. The government waived service of notice and was granted time to file a reply; the petitioner was permitted to serve the third respondent by all available modes including court notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3842/2026
Case Summary: WP 3842/2026 Krishna Chitranjan Raut's writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others was heard on 11-06-2026. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents and adjourned the matter to 30-07-2026. The government waived service of notice and was granted time to file a reply; the petitioner was permitted to serve the third respondent by all available modes including court notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts