KAMLESH SHIVPRASAD GUPTA AND ANOTHER vs DAULAT SHANKARRAO AWALE AND OTHERS — CAS/489/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERXXIIRULE4. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040131372026

e-Filing Number

15-04-2026

Filing Number

CAS/8944/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

CAS/489/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERXXIIRULE4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESH SHIVPRASAD GUPTA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. SAHIL S. DEWANI

  2. 2.INAYATULLA KHAN SHAMIMULLA KHAN THROUGH POA KAMLESH GUPTA

    Adv. Sahil Shyam Dewani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAULAT SHANKARRAO AWALE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MOHAMMAD MUSTAQ RANGOONWALA

  3. 3.PRAG PRAKASH BHANTIA

  4. 4.MOHAMMAD FIRROZ RANGOONWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    —

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF

    Case Summary: CAS/489/2026 The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed the appellants' application to set aside the abatement of Respondent No. 1, who died on 23.11.2023. The court found the grounds for setting aside abatement and condoning the delay in filing the application to be bonafide and substantial, as the cause of action survives the respondent's death. The court permitted the appellants to substitute the deceased respondent's legal heirs on record within two weeks and disposed of a related application (CAS No. 1292/2025) as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAS/489/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAS/489/2026 The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed the appellants' application to set aside the abatement of Respondent No. 1, who died on 23.11.2023. The court found the grounds for setting aside abatement and condoning the delay in filing the application to be bonafide and substantial, as the cause of action survives the respondent's death. The court permitted the appellants to substitute the deceased respondent's legal heirs on record within two weeks and disposed of a related application (CAS No. 1292/2025) as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case