SREEJIT S/O SHIVKUMAR PANIKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH POLICE STATION WARDHA, DIST WARDHA AND ANR. — WP/295/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226&227. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040130542026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/4176/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/295/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226&227
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),3(5)
The Fertilizer (Control) Order 1985 Section 2,5,7,8,20B
Essential Commodities Act Section 3,7
Insecticides Act, 1968 Section 7,11,10,13,15,29,9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SREEJIT S/O SHIVKUMAR PANIKAR

    Adv. AMOL SHRIPAD DESHPANDE, ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 AND

  2. 2.SWPANIL DEEPAK TOPRE

    Adv. AMOL SHRIPAD DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH POLICE STATION WARDHA, DIST WARDHA AND ANR.

  2. 2.RAJSHREE PRASHANT CHAPHALE

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP 295/2026, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard arguments from petitioners Sreejit and Swpanil contending that an FIR was lodged in violation of Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968, which requires written consent from an authorized officer before cognizance. The Court issued notice to respondents (State of Maharashtra and Rajshree Prashant Chaphale) returnable on 30.06.2026, with the APP waiving service and seeking time to file a reply. The petition was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP 295/2026, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard arguments from petitioners Sreejit and Swpanil contending that an FIR was lodged in violation of Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968, which requires written consent from an authorized officer before cognizance. The Court issued notice to respondents (State of Maharashtra and Rajshree Prashant Chaphale) returnable on 30.06.2026, with the APP waiving service and seeking time to file a reply. The petition was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case