THE MAHA. AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVPT. CORP. LTD., THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER, SURESH B. SONAWANE vs M/S. PADGILWAR AGRO INDUSTRIES, THR. ITS PARTNER, TUSHAR C. PADGILWAR Advocate - MAKRAND RAJKONDAWAR, (FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/3052/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 20th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040128582026
Filing Number
WP/8751/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/3052/2026
Registration Date
15-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed-Off
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MAHA. AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVPT. CORP. LTD., THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER, SURESH B. SONAWANE
Adv. SAURAV PRASHANT RAJURKAR,JOSHI BHUSHAN CHANDRAKANT,JOSHI BHUSHAN CHANDRAKANT, ,JOSHI BHUSHAN CHANDRAKANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. PADGILWAR AGRO INDUSTRIES, THR. ITS PARTNER, TUSHAR C. PADGILWAR Advocate - MAKRAND RAJKONDAWAR, (FOR RESPONDENT)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
For Admission At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
-
23-Apr-2026
—
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
The Nagpur High Court disposed of the writ petition by setting aside the Trial Court's order rejecting the extension of time request, granting the petitioner (Maha. Agro Industries) four weeks to deposit 75% of Rs. 7,37,88,135 as security for staying an arbitral award of Rs. 3,18,49,137 plus interest under the MSMED Act, 2006. The court found the petitioner's reasons for extension (approval/permission delays) justified in the interest of justice, though it rejected the request to substitute deposit with a bank guarantee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3052/2026
The Nagpur High Court disposed of the writ petition by setting aside the Trial Court's order rejecting the extension of time request, granting the petitioner (Maha. Agro Industries) four weeks to deposit 75% of Rs. 7,37,88,135 as security for staying an arbitral award of Rs. 3,18,49,137 plus interest under the MSMED Act, 2006. The court found the petitioner's reasons for extension (approval/permission delays) justified in the interest of justice, though it rejected the request to substitute deposit with a bank guarantee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts