THE MAHA. AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVPT. CORP. LTD., THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER, SURESH B. SONAWANE vs M/S. PADGILWAR AGRO INDUSTRIES, THR. ITS PARTNER, TUSHAR C. PADGILWAR Advocate - MAKRAND RAJKONDAWAR, (FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/3052/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 20th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040128582026
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
Filing Number
WP/8751/2026
Filing Date
15-04-2026
Registration No
WP/3052/2026
Registration Date
15-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed-Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE MAHA. AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVPT. CORP. LTD., THR. DY. GENERAL MANAGER, SURESH B. SONAWANE
Adv. SAURAV PRASHANT RAJURKAR,JOSHI BHUSHAN CHANDRAKANT,JOSHI BHUSHAN CHANDRAKANT, ,JOSHI BHUSHAN CHANDRAKANT
Respondent(s)
M/S. PADGILWAR AGRO INDUSTRIES, THR. ITS PARTNER, TUSHAR C. PADGILWAR Advocate - MAKRAND RAJKONDAWAR, (FOR RESPONDENT)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION AT 2.30 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | |
| 20-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 15-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION AT 2.30 P.M. |
Orders
The Nagpur High Court disposed of the writ petition by setting aside the Trial Court's order rejecting the extension of time request, granting the petitioner (Maha. Agro Industries) four weeks to deposit 75% of Rs. 7,37,88,135 as security for staying an arbitral award of Rs. 3,18,49,137 plus interest under the MSMED Act, 2006. The court found the petitioner's reasons for extension (approval/permission delays) justified in the interest of justice, though it rejected the request to substitute deposit with a bank guarantee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Nagpur High Court disposed of the writ petition by setting aside the Trial Court's order rejecting the extension of time request, granting the petitioner (Maha. Agro Industries) four weeks to deposit 75% of Rs. 7,37,88,135 as security for staying an arbitral award of Rs. 3,18,49,137 plus interest under the MSMED Act, 2006. The court found the petitioner's reasons for extension (approval/permission delays) justified in the interest of justice, though it rejected the request to substitute deposit with a bank guarantee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts