VEDANTI S/O RAVINDRA DHARNE, THR. HER LEGAL GUARDIAN FATHER, RAVINDRA S. DHARNE vs THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHANDUR RAILWAY, AMRAVATI — WP/3152/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040128162026
Filing Number
WP/8717/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/3152/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VEDANTI S/O RAVINDRA DHARNE, THR. HER LEGAL GUARDIAN FATHER, RAVINDRA S. DHARNE
Adv. PREETI D RANE,HIMANI KAVI,HIMANI KAVI, ,HIMANI KAVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHANDUR RAILWAY, AMRAVATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
—
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/3152/2026 The Nagpur High Court allowed a writ petition by 17-year-old Vedanti Dharne seeking issuance of a 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe caste certificate. The court found the Sub-Divisional Officer's demand for additional documents (Family Tree and Home Enquiry Report) was without jurisdiction, as the petitioner had already submitted sufficient supporting documents including her father's Form C certificate, School Leaving Certificate, and a Birth Register Extract dating to 1923. The court quashed the Officer's communication dated 25.03.2026 and directed issuance of the caste certificate within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3152/2026
Case Summary: WP/3152/2026 The Nagpur High Court allowed a writ petition by 17-year-old Vedanti Dharne seeking issuance of a 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe caste certificate. The court found the Sub-Divisional Officer's demand for additional documents (Family Tree and Home Enquiry Report) was without jurisdiction, as the petitioner had already submitted sufficient supporting documents including her father's Form C certificate, School Leaving Certificate, and a Birth Register Extract dating to 1923. The court quashed the Officer's communication dated 25.03.2026 and directed issuance of the caste certificate within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts