SHAIK RAZIQUE HUSAIN MAHAMMAD SHAFI AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTR, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER, MUMBAI AND ORS. — CP/195/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section U/S 12. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040127662026
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-04-2026
Filing Number
CP/8687/2026
Filing Date
10-04-2026
Registration No
CP/195/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAIK RAZIQUE HUSAIN MAHAMMAD SHAFI AND OTHERS
Adv. PRAMOD A. KULKARNI
SANTOSH NAMDEVRAO SOLANKE
SANTOSH CHUDAMAN LAYSE
SABULA HIRALAL BETHEKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTR, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER, MUMBAI AND ORS.
THE STATE OF MAHA. DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THR. SECY. AN WATER CONSERVATION, MUMBAI
DR. NITIN AMBADEKAR, DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, MUMBAI
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI
SMT. SANJITA MAHAPATRA, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AMRAVATI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
CONTEMEPT PETITION - FOR ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-06-2026 | |
| 23-06-2026 | CONTEMEPT PETITION - FOR ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: In Contempt Petition No. 195/2026, the Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Bombay granted leave to delete respondent nos. 1-4 from the petition. The petitioners alleged contempt of a November 27, 2020 court order and were directed to justify the belated filing. The court granted time for petitioners' counsel to place documents on record and adjourned the case for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: In Contempt Petition No. 195/2026, the Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Bombay granted leave to delete respondent nos. 1-4 from the petition. The petitioners alleged contempt of a November 27, 2020 court order and were directed to justify the belated filing. The court granted time for petitioners' counsel to place documents on record and adjourned the case for hearing after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts