LAXMAN RAMAKRISHNA FUPARE AND OTHERS vs SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS — WP/3035/2026

Case under Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226,227. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040127212026

Filing Number

WP/8661/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3035/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAXMAN RAMAKRISHNA FUPARE AND OTHERS

    Adv. PUSHKAR GHARE

  2. 2.ASHOK PUNAJI FUPARE

  3. 3.SUKHDEO PUNAJI FUPARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS

  2. 2.TAHSILDAR, YAVATMAL

  3. 3.AYURVEDA SEVA SAMITI, YAVATMAL, THR. SECRETARY

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    Summary: The writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order rejecting the stay application was admitted. The court issued notice to respondents returnable after four weeks and granted interim relief protecting the petitioners' land possession from disturbance pending final hearing. Service of notice was waived for the State, with petitioners permitted to serve remaining respondents by private mode. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3035/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order rejecting the stay application was admitted. The court issued notice to respondents returnable after four weeks and granted interim relief protecting the petitioners' land possession from disturbance pending final hearing. Service of notice was waived for the State, with petitioners permitted to serve remaining respondents by private mode. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case