LAXMAN RAMAKRISHNA FUPARE AND OTHERS vs SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS — WP/3035/2026

Case under Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226,227. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040127212026

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/8661/2026

Filing Date

10-04-2026

Registration No

WP/3035/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

LAXMAN RAMAKRISHNA FUPARE AND OTHERS

Adv. PUSHKAR GHARE

ASHOK PUNAJI FUPARE

SUKHDEO PUNAJI FUPARE

Respondent(s)

SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS

TAHSILDAR, YAVATMAL

AYURVEDA SEVA SAMITI, YAVATMAL, THR. SECRETARY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

23-04-2026
11-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Summary: The writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order rejecting the stay application was admitted. The court issued notice to respondents returnable after four weeks and granted interim relief protecting the petitioners' land possession from disturbance pending final hearing. Service of notice was waived for the State, with petitioners permitted to serve remaining respondents by private mode. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order rejecting the stay application was admitted. The court issued notice to respondents returnable after four weeks and granted interim relief protecting the petitioners' land possession from disturbance pending final hearing. Service of notice was waived for the State, with petitioners permitted to serve remaining respondents by private mode. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case