MAYUR S/O NAGORAOJI HIRADKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI AND ORS. — CAW/906/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040126362026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

Filing Number

CAW/8608/2026

Filing Date

10-04-2026

Registration No

CAW/906/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

MAYUR S/O NAGORAOJI HIRADKAR

Adv. ANUP SHANKAR DHORE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

23-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The Nagpur Bench High Court allowed Mayur Hiradkar's civil application in his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The court directed necessary amendments within one week and ordered fresh notice to respondent No.4, while allowing the petitioner to participate in a fresh tender without prejudice to his rights and making any work order subject to the petition's outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Bench High Court allowed Mayur Hiradkar's civil application in his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The court directed necessary amendments within one week and ordered fresh notice to respondent No.4, while allowing the petitioner to participate in a fresh tender without prejudice to his rights and making any work order subject to the petition's outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case