JAYPRAKASH N. BORKER vs THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ANOTHER — CAO/438/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040126012026
Filing Number
CAO/8576/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CAO/438/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYPRAKASH N. BORKER
Adv. CHAUDHARI ASHISH SHAMRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ, THR. SECY., GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
—
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed Jayprakash N. Borker's application for condonation of 10 days' delay in filing a restoration application for his writ petition, which had been rejected for failure to comply with office objection removal orders due to his counsel's ill health. The court also allowed the restoration application itself, permitting the petitioner two weeks to remove the office objections before the writ petition would be restored for merit consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CAO/438/2026
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed Jayprakash N. Borker's application for condonation of 10 days' delay in filing a restoration application for his writ petition, which had been rejected for failure to comply with office objection removal orders due to his counsel's ill health. The court also allowed the restoration application itself, permitting the petitioner two weeks to remove the office objections before the writ petition would be restored for merit consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts