NILESH S/O GENDU KARIYAR vs THE CHIEF OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ACHALPUR, AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER — WP/3443/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040125912022
Filing Number
WP/8472/2022
Filing Date
08-Jun-2022
Registration No
WP/3443/2022
Registration Date
24-Jun-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Category
APPOINTMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES ( 3 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NILESH S/O GENDU KARIYAR
Adv. SAGAR KATKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CHIEF OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ACHALPUR, AMRAVATI AND ANOTHER
Adv. ,NITIN K. KAUTKAR,GAURAV S. GOUR,RAJESH S. NAYAK,(FOR R
-
2.,MANSI MANGESH KADU,SANKET A. PURANIK,SAKET V. NARSAPURKAR,NEERAJ S. KHANDEWALE 1123
-
3.AJAY RADHELAL KARIYAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) on 08/05/2026 directed the petitioner Nilesh Kariyar, who appeared in person seeking to withdraw the writ petition, to be identified and verified by the Registrar (Judicial) before the withdrawal could be processed, as the original advocate was absent. The court requested the Registrar to submit a report confirming the petitioner's identity and withdrawal intention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Aug-2022
Fresh Admission - Circulated (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
27-Jun-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
27-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3443/2022
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) on 08/05/2026 directed the petitioner Nilesh Kariyar, who appeared in person seeking to withdraw the writ petition, to be identified and verified by the Registrar (Judicial) before the withdrawal could be processed, as the original advocate was absent. The court requested the Registrar to submit a report confirming the petitioner's identity and withdrawal intention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts