SUSHILSINGH S/O JAIPRAKASHSINGH THAKUR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO PS RAMNAGAR CHANDRAPUR DIST. CHANDRAPUR AND ANOTHER — APL/507/2025

Case under Prevention of Communal, Anti-social and Other Dangerous Activities Act (Maharashtra) Section 528. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-May-2025

CNR: HCBM040125702025

e-Filing Number

30-03-2025

Filing Number

APL/3331/2025

Filing Date

17-Apr-2025

Registration No

APL/507/2025

Registration Date

23-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Communal, Anti-social and Other Dangerous Activities Act (Maharashtra) Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 498 A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILSINGH S/O JAIPRAKASHSINGH THAKUR

    Adv. AMIT VASANTRAO BAND,NILESH C. NAGAPURE,NILESH C. NAGAPURE, ,DEVASHISH AMRUT DESHPANDE,NILESH C. NAGAPURE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO PS (Police Station) RAMNAGAR CHANDRAPUR DIST. CHANDRAPUR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. CHANDEKAR ANIRUDDHA MUKUND,RATNA A SINGH,SANDEEP NARESH SINGH,KISHORI B. DONGARWAR,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR,GANESH G. AMRUTKAR,RUSHIKESH R. MAHAJAN,ARPIT BHARAT WAGHIDE 1123

  2. 2.SAU. POOJA SINGH SUSHILSINGH THAKUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: APL/507/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed the FIR No. 06/2022 and charge-sheet against Sushilsingh Thakur under Section 498-A IPC. The parties settled their dispute, with the applicant paying Rs. 5,51,000 to the complainant (non-applicant No. 2), who gave no objection to quashing the proceedings. The court allowed the application subject to both parties depositing Rs. 20,000 each to the Public Welfare Account within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Applications For Admission After Notice (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  7. 11-Sep-2025

    Office Objection Not Removed (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    Office Objection Not Removed (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  10. 04-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Application For Admission - Fresh - (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  12. 14-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  13. 06-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 17-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/507/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APL/507/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed the FIR No. 06/2022 and charge-sheet against Sushilsingh Thakur under Section 498-A IPC. The parties settled their dispute, with the applicant paying Rs. 5,51,000 to the complainant (non-applicant No. 2), who gave no objection to quashing the proceedings. The court allowed the application subject to both parties depositing Rs. 20,000 each to the Public Welfare Account within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case