MANISH ANANDWARDHAN TRIVEDI vs JOINT POLICE COMMISSIONER (HEAD QUARTER) C.P. OFFICE NAGPUR CITY AND 2 OTHERS — APPW/119/2026
Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section U/S5. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040124992026
Filing Number
APPW/3976/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
APPW/119/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--C.A. Disposed off
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANISH ANANDWARDHAN TRIVEDI
Adv. C.G. BARAPATRE
Respondent(s)
-
1.JOINT POLICE COMMISSIONER (HEAD QUARTER) C.P. OFFICE NAGPUR CITY AND 2 OTHERS
-
2.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS (Police Station) AJNI NAGPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted condonation of delay and restored Criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2022. The original petition had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections within the stipulated four-week period. The court found reasonable and justifiable grounds for the delay, including the petitioner's inadvertence and his need to frequently travel to care for his ill sister suffering from a rare disease, outweighing the State's objections to condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
—
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APPW/119/2026
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted condonation of delay and restored Criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2022. The original petition had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections within the stipulated four-week period. The court found reasonable and justifiable grounds for the delay, including the petitioner's inadvertence and his need to frequently travel to care for his ill sister suffering from a rare disease, outweighing the State's objections to condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts