MANISH ANANDWARDHAN TRIVEDI vs JOINT POLICE COMMISSIONER (HEAD QUARTER) C.P. OFFICE NAGPUR CITY AND 2 OTHERS — APPW/119/2026
Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section U/S5. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040124992026
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
APPW/3976/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
APPW/119/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--C.A. Disposed off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANISH ANANDWARDHAN TRIVEDI
Adv. C.G. BARAPATRE
Respondent(s)
JOINT POLICE COMMISSIONER (HEAD QUARTER) C.P. OFFICE NAGPUR CITY AND 2 OTHERS
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS (Police Station) AJNI NAGPUR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted condonation of delay and restored Criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2022. The original petition had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections within the stipulated four-week period. The court found reasonable and justifiable grounds for the delay, including the petitioner's inadvertence and his need to frequently travel to care for his ill sister suffering from a rare disease, outweighing the State's objections to condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted condonation of delay and restored Criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2022. The original petition had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections within the stipulated four-week period. The court found reasonable and justifiable grounds for the delay, including the petitioner's inadvertence and his need to frequently travel to care for his ill sister suffering from a rare disease, outweighing the State's objections to condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts