SUNITA RAJESH KHETAN vs COMPETENT AUTHORITY (LAND ACQUISITION) NATIONAL NIGHWAY -6 /SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BALAPUR — HCBM40124862025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040124862025

e-Filing Number

17-04-2025

Filing Number

AA/9169/2025

Filing Date

17-Apr-2025

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA RAJESH KHETAN

    Adv. RANJEET SINGH V. GAHILOT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMPETENT AUTHORITY (LAND ACQUISITION) NATIONAL NIGHWAY -6 /SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BALAPUR

  2. 2.PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT- AMRAVATI

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    For Orders - -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard Arbitration Appeal No. 9169 of 2025 between Sunita Rajesh Khetan and the Competent Authority (Land Acquisition) for National Highway-6, Balapur on 26th March, 2026. The case was adjourned with no parties present, and a Stand Over (S.O.) order was issued for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial)

  6. 16-Oct-2025

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  7. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Apr-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard Arbitration Appeal No. 9169 of 2025 between Sunita Rajesh Khetan and the Competent Authority (Land Acquisition) for National Highway-6, Balapur on 26th March, 2026. The case was adjourned with no parties present, and a Stand Over (S.O.) order was issued for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case