EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, BULDHANA AND OTHERS vs SAHEBRAO VITHOBA SAVANT AND OTHERS — HCBM40122402025
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section 74.
CNR: HCBM040122402025
Filing Number
FA/8977/2025
Filing Date
16-Apr-2025
Judge
Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, BULDHANA AND OTHERS
Adv. UDAY ARUN GOSAVI,SHUBHANGI MUKUND VYAS,SHUBHANGI MUKUND VYAS, ,MANDAR H. MAHASHABDE,ASHWINI S. BHAGWAT,SHUBHANGI MUKUND VYAS
-
2.CHIEF ENGINEER, V.I.D.C., BULDHANA
-
3.EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, V.I.D.C. BULDHANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAHEBRAO VITHOBA SAVANT AND OTHERS
-
2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BULDHANA
-
3.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, (MEDIUM PROJECT), BULDHANA
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
24-Mar-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
Summary: In First Appeal No. 832 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench, Nagpur, the case between Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Buldhana (Petitioner) and Sahebrao Vithoba Savant (Respondent) was adjourned. No parties were present in court on 24th March 2026, and the matter was stood over for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Nov-2025
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
07-Oct-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2025
Case filed
Summary: In First Appeal No. 832 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench, Nagpur, the case between Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Buldhana (Petitioner) and Sahebrao Vithoba Savant (Respondent) was adjourned. No parties were present in court on 24th March 2026, and the matter was stood over for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts