SHAKIL MUSTAFA SIDDIKI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PS PSO GONDIA AND ANR — APEAL/174/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040122142026
e-Filing Number
07-04-2026
Filing Number
APEAL/3867/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
APEAL/174/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST ORDER OF CONVICTION ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAKIL MUSTAFA SIDDIKI
Adv. DIPESH N. MEHTA,SANKET ARUN DETHE,SANKET ARUN DETHE, ,SANKET ARUN DETHE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PS (Police Station) PSO GONDIA AND ANR
-
2.X Y Z
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
For Orders - (Criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
-
19-Jun-2026
For Orders - (Criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF
In Criminal Appeal No. 174 of 2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard petitioner Shakil Mustafa Siddiki's appeal against the State of Maharashtra. By consent of both parties, the court adjourned the case to after vacation. No substantive order on merits was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Appeals For Admission - Fresh ( Criminal Side Matters )
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/174/2026
In Criminal Appeal No. 174 of 2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard petitioner Shakil Mustafa Siddiki's appeal against the State of Maharashtra. By consent of both parties, the court adjourned the case to after vacation. No substantive order on merits was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts