PRAVIN S/O. PRABHAKAR KITE AND ANOTHER vs SHUBHAM NAGARIK SAHAKARI MYDT. PATSANSTHA, NAGPUR THR. MANAGER, NAGPUR Advocate - N.V. TAPAS, (FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/2967/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM040121392026

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

Filing Number

WP/8302/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

WP/2967/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

PRAVIN S/O. PRABHAKAR KITE AND ANOTHER

Adv. SAILESH S. SITANI,SYED OWAIS AHMED,SYED OWAIS AHMED, ,SYED OWAIS AHMED

GIRISH S/O. HARISHCHANDRA CHUTE

Respondent(s)

SHUBHAM NAGARIK SAHAKARI MYDT. PATSANSTHA, NAGPUR THR. MANAGER, NAGPUR Advocate - N.V. TAPAS, (FOR RESPONDENT)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

23-04-2026
04-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION-CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT MATTERS

21-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION-CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT MATTERS

17-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION-CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT MATTERS

Orders

21-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Case Summary: In WP/2967/2026, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the petitioners' challenge against Shubham Nagarik Sahakari Mydt. Patsanstha, Nagpur. The court issued notice to the respondent (returnable 04.05.2026) after noting the respondent had not communicated the exact outstanding amount despite petitioners' inquiry on 11.04.2026. Petitioners were permitted to serve the respondent via private mode in addition to regular service, with case adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP/2967/2026, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court heard the petitioners' challenge against Shubham Nagarik Sahakari Mydt. Patsanstha, Nagpur. The court issued notice to the respondent (returnable 04.05.2026) after noting the respondent had not communicated the exact outstanding amount despite petitioners' inquiry on 11.04.2026. Petitioners were permitted to serve the respondent via private mode in addition to regular service, with case adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case