RAJENDRA GANGADHAR MENKUDALE vs THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, YAVATMAL, THR. CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL AND ANOTHER — WP/3037/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040120512026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/8228/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

WP/3037/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act
Mah. Muncipalties Act
Service Matter

Petitioner(s)

RAJENDRA GANGADHAR MENKUDALE

Adv. RUGVED BHASKARRAO DHORE

Respondent(s)

THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, YAVATMAL, THR. CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL AND ANOTHER

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AMRAVATI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

28-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court directed the Municipal Council, Yavatmal to decide the petitioner's pending representation (dated 27.3.2026) within three weeks according to law, and suspended the order declaring him surplus until that decision is made. The court found merit in the petitioner's contention that no hearing was provided before declaring him surplus, and directed him to appear before the respondent on 20th April, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court directed the Municipal Council, Yavatmal to decide the petitioner's pending representation (dated 27.3.2026) within three weeks according to law, and suspended the order declaring him surplus until that decision is made. The court found merit in the petitioner's contention that no hearing was provided before declaring him surplus, and directed him to appear before the respondent on 20th April, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Mah. Muncipalties Act Service Matter All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case