VILAS DASHRATH KALE vs THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, YAVATMAL THR. CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL AND ANR. — WP/3036/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040120492026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/8226/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

WP/3036/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act
Mah. Muncipalties Act
Service Matter

Petitioner(s)

VILAS DASHRATH KALE

Adv. RUGVED BHASKARRAO DHORE

Respondent(s)

THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, YAVATMAL THR. CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL AND ANR.

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AMRAVATI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

28-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) granted partial relief to Dr. Vilas Dashrath Kale, a teacher declared surplus by the Yavatmal Municipal Council, by staying the implementation of the surplus declaration order pending decision of his representation. The court directed the respondent to decide his pending representation within three weeks, finding merit in his contention that he was not given a hearing before the surplus declaration order was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) granted partial relief to Dr. Vilas Dashrath Kale, a teacher declared surplus by the Yavatmal Municipal Council, by staying the implementation of the surplus declaration order pending decision of his representation. The court directed the respondent to decide his pending representation within three weeks, finding merit in his contention that he was not given a hearing before the surplus declaration order was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Mah. Muncipalties Act Service Matter All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case