MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. AMRAVATI THR. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — CAW/841/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Next hearing 23-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040118822026

Filing Number

CAW/8127/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CAW/841/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. AMRAVATI THR. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER

    Adv. SHRIDHAR VASUDEO PUROHIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: CAW/841/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the matter to June 19, 2026, after accepting an undertaking from the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No.3) that no coercive action will be taken regarding LBT charges and property tax claims pending settlement of disputes. The court noted a bilateral dispute involving electricity dues owed by the Corporation to MSEDCL and tax claims owed by MSEDCL to the Corporation, and encouraged both public authorities to reach an amicable settlement including payment obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    —

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAW/841/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAW/841/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the matter to June 19, 2026, after accepting an undertaking from the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No.3) that no coercive action will be taken regarding LBT charges and property tax claims pending settlement of disputes. The court noted a bilateral dispute involving electricity dues owed by the Corporation to MSEDCL and tax claims owed by MSEDCL to the Corporation, and encouraged both public authorities to reach an amicable settlement including payment obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case