PRATIKSHA SANKALP BURCHUNDE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS WANI DIST YAVATMAL AND ANR. — APL/787/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040118482026
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
e-Filing Number
03-04-2026
Filing Number
APL/3737/2026
Filing Date
04-04-2026
Registration No
APL/787/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRATIKSHA SANKALP BURCHUNDE
Adv. MAHESH VASANT RAI,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 AND 2,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 AND 2, ,NAINA P. DHOKE,MAYANK YADAV,NANESHWAR P. CHAWARE,SMITA S. WAGHMARE,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 AND
PRATIMA SANKALP BURCHUNDE
Adv. RAI MAHESH VASANT
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS (Police Station) WANI DIST YAVATMAL AND ANR.
KISHOR BHAURAO KARMARKAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION FRESH (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | |
| 01-07-2026 | APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION FRESH (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
Case Summary: APL/787/2026 The mother-in-law and sister-in-law of a deceased woman sought to quash a charge-sheet filed against them, alleging the woman's suicide resulted from torture by the applicants and her husband. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to non-applicants returnable after Summer Vacations, with the State waiving service requirements. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APL/787/2026 The mother-in-law and sister-in-law of a deceased woman sought to quash a charge-sheet filed against them, alleging the woman's suicide resulted from torture by the applicants and her husband. The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to non-applicants returnable after Summer Vacations, with the State waiving service requirements. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts