AJAY S/O HARISHCHANDRA TIWARI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS YASHODHARA NAGAR, DIST. NAGPUR CITY AND ANR Advocate - MAYUKH M. AWODE, ,G.T. RAMTEKE,BHUPESH TABHANE,ADV. FOR R2 — APL/785/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040117202026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

APL/3697/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

APL/785/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 420,406,465,468,471

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY S/O HARISHCHANDRA TIWARI AND OTHERS

    Adv. GURUDEO N. SHARMA, ,GHULAM ABBAS QUBBAWALA,MOHAMMED GHULAM ABBAS QUBBAWALA,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 TO

  2. 2.CHANDRAMANI S/O MANGAL GONDANE

    Adv. SHARMA GURUDEO NANHELAL

  3. 3.SARITA W/O AJAY TIWARI

    Adv. SHARMA GURUDEO NANHELAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) YASHODHARA NAGAR, DIST. NAGPUR CITY AND ANR Advocate - MAYUKH M. AWODE, ,G.T. RAMTEKE,BHUPESH TABHANE,ADV. FOR R2

  2. 2.HARSH PAWAN JANBANDHU

    Adv. AWODE MAYUKH MANWENDRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: APL 785/2026 The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench allowed the applicants' petition to quash FIR No. 269/2022 and charge-sheet No. 98/2023, which involved allegations of fraud and forgery in a property sale deed transaction. The court found that the parties had settled the dispute during proceedings, with the complainant withdrawing his civil suit and stating he had no grievance against the applicants, making conviction unlikely. The FIR and related proceedings were quashed subject to the applicants paying Rs. 20,000 as costs to the Public Welfare Account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Applications For Admission Fresh (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi PhalkeView PDF

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/785/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APL 785/2026 The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench allowed the applicants' petition to quash FIR No. 269/2022 and charge-sheet No. 98/2023, which involved allegations of fraud and forgery in a property sale deed transaction. The court found that the parties had settled the dispute during proceedings, with the complainant withdrawing his civil suit and stating he had no grievance against the applicants, making conviction unlikely. The FIR and related proceedings were quashed subject to the applicants paying Rs. 20,000 as costs to the Public Welfare Account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case