VAISHALI SANJAY BAIS AND OTHERS KADU RAJU LAXMAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SPO., PS WASHIM GRAMIN DIST . WASHIM AND ANR — APPP/1156/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040116702026

e-Filing Number

02-04-2026

Filing Number

APPP/3692/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

APPP/1156/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAISHALI SANJAY BAIS AND OTHERS KADU RAJU LAXMAN

  2. 2.RUPALI SANJAY BAIS

  3. 3.DEEPALI SANJAY BAIS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SPO., PS (Police Station) WASHIM GRAMIN DIST . WASHIM AND ANR

  2. 2.SUNIL SANJU BHONSLE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    For Orders - At 02.30 P.M. In Chamber

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi PhalkeView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, issued a preliminary order in Criminal Application No. 1156 of 2026 on 07.05.2026. The Court directed notice to be issued to the applicants (Vaishali Sanjay Bais and others), permitted Non-applicant No. 2 to serve the applicants through all modes of service with affidavit filing, and adjourned the matter to be heard after Summer Vacation. No substantive order on merit was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPP/1156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, issued a preliminary order in Criminal Application No. 1156 of 2026 on 07.05.2026. The Court directed notice to be issued to the applicants (Vaishali Sanjay Bais and others), permitted Non-applicant No. 2 to serve the applicants through all modes of service with affidavit filing, and adjourned the matter to be heard after Summer Vacation. No substantive order on merit was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case