VADILAL S/O KANJIBHAI KHETANI vs STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECY., DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2848/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040116002026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/7932/2026

Filing Date

02-04-2026

Registration No

WP/2848/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

VADILAL S/O KANJIBHAI KHETANI

Adv. SWAPNIL SURESH SHINGANE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECY., DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS.

DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY-3 AND LIQUIDATOR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

18-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation (dated 07/11/2025) within 8 weeks from the court order date, and communicate the decision within 2 weeks thereafter. The court found that sufficient time had already elapsed since the representation's submission and mandated expedited resolution without awarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation (dated 07/11/2025) within 8 weeks from the court order date, and communicate the decision within 2 weeks thereafter. The court found that sufficient time had already elapsed since the representation's submission and mandated expedited resolution without awarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case