JAGDISH S/O KANJI KHETANI vs STATE OF MAHA., THR. ITS SECY., DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2852/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040115982026

Filing Number

WP/7930/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/2852/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISH S/O KANJI KHETANI

    Adv. SWAPNIL SURESH SHINGANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHA., THR. ITS SECY., DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY-

  3. 3.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY-3 AND LIQUIDATOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    —

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 07/11/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court found sufficient time had elapsed since the representation's submission and mandated timely disposal of the pending matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2852/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 07/11/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court found sufficient time had elapsed since the representation's submission and mandated timely disposal of the pending matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case