ARUNA NILESH PATHAK AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT. MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2990/2026
Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040115202026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/7868/2026
Filing Date
02-04-2026
Registration No
WP/2990/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARUNA NILESH PATHAK AND OTHERS
Adv. PRADEEP SHANTARAM KSHIRSAGAR,C. B. PAWAR,C. B. PAWAR, ,GAURAV O. GADGE,C. B. PAWAR
PRAJKTA SANJAY BAPAT
PRADNYALINI ANIL SONEWAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT. MUMBAI AND ORS.
THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, YAVATMAL, THR. CHIEF OFFICER
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL YAVATMAL
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AMRAVATI, DIVISION, AMRAVATI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
FRESH ADMISSION - CIRCULATED (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | |
| 17-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION - CIRCULATED (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
Summary: The Writ Petition (WP 2990/2026) filed by Aruna and others against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. Notice was issued to all respondents, returnable on 17-06-2026, with special directions for service on respondent nos. 2 and 3 through all permissible modes including hamdast service. The petitioners were directed to file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Writ Petition (WP 2990/2026) filed by Aruna and others against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. Notice was issued to all respondents, returnable on 17-06-2026, with special directions for service on respondent nos. 2 and 3 through all permissible modes including hamdast service. The petitioners were directed to file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts