PRAMOD KUMAR S/O GANPATRAO PINGE vs CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER — WP/2799/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040114972026
Filing Number
WP/7856/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/2799/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAMOD KUMAR S/O GANPATRAO PINGE
Adv. RAJAT KUMAR MAHESHWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER
-
2.STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, MUMBAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition after the State Information Commissioner produced the decision dated 7/11/2025 disposing of the petitioner's appeal. Since the petitioner's main grievance—seeking direction to decide the appeal—was redressed by the Commissioner's decision, the court found the petition moot and disposed of it, while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the Commissioner's order through appropriate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2799/2026
Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition after the State Information Commissioner produced the decision dated 7/11/2025 disposing of the petitioner's appeal. Since the petitioner's main grievance—seeking direction to decide the appeal—was redressed by the Commissioner's decision, the court found the petition moot and disposed of it, while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the Commissioner's order through appropriate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts