PRAMOD KUMAR S/O GANPATRAO PINGE vs CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER — WP/2799/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 27th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040114972026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/7856/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

WP/2799/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Right to Information Act, 2005 Section ---

Petitioner(s)

PRAMOD KUMAR S/O GANPATRAO PINGE

Adv. RAJAT KUMAR MAHESHWARI

Respondent(s)

CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

18-04-2026
27-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

27-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition after the State Information Commissioner produced the decision dated 7/11/2025 disposing of the petitioner's appeal. Since the petitioner's main grievance—seeking direction to decide the appeal—was redressed by the Commissioner's decision, the court found the petition moot and disposed of it, while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the Commissioner's order through appropriate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition after the State Information Commissioner produced the decision dated 7/11/2025 disposing of the petitioner's appeal. Since the petitioner's main grievance—seeking direction to decide the appeal—was redressed by the Commissioner's decision, the court found the petition moot and disposed of it, while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the Commissioner's order through appropriate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case