BANK OF INDIA, NAGPUR, THR. AUTH. OFFICER/ REPRESENTATIVE SH. SANJAY TRIPATHI vs UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP/2800/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040114852026
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Number
WP/7845/2026
Filing Date
01-04-2026
Registration No
WP/2800/2026
Registration Date
04-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BANK OF INDIA, NAGPUR, THR. AUTH. OFFICER/ REPRESENTATIVE SH. SANJAY TRIPATHI
Adv. AWADHOOT T. PUROHIT,TUFEL YASIN SHARIF,TUFEL YASIN SHARIF, ,TUFEL YASIN SHARIF
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
M/S ABHIJEET MADC NAGPUR ENERGY PVT. LTD., NAGPUR, THR. LIQUIDATOR SH. VINOD KUMAR KOTHARI
SH. MANOJ S/O. BANSANTLAL JAYASWAL
SH. ABHISHEK S/O MANOJ JAYASWAL
M/S ABHIJEET INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., NAGPUR
M/S. ABHIJEET POWER LTD., NAGPUR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 |
Orders
The Nagpur Bench High Court disposed of Bank of India's writ petition and directed the Debt Recovery Tribunal to decide the bank's application for pre-judgment attachment of properties (IA No.1630/2024) within four weeks, citing Section 17(5) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which prescribes a 60-day statutory limit with possible extension up to four months. The bank had sought attachment following the defendants' default on a Rs.86.40 crore loan, and the DRT's pending application remained undecided for months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Nagpur Bench High Court disposed of Bank of India's writ petition and directed the Debt Recovery Tribunal to decide the bank's application for pre-judgment attachment of properties (IA No.1630/2024) within four weeks, citing Section 17(5) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, which prescribes a 60-day statutory limit with possible extension up to four months. The bank had sought attachment following the defendants' default on a Rs.86.40 crore loan, and the DRT's pending application remained undecided for months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts