ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CHENNAI vs VINOD HARIBHAU KHEKADE AND OTHERS Advocate - ANKUSH PRABHAKARRAO KALMEGH — CAF/1551/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040114632026
Filing Number
CAF/7826/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
CAF/1551/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CHENNAI
Adv. HITESH N. VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINOD HARIBHAU KHEKADE AND OTHERS Advocate - ANKUSH PRABHAKARRAO KALMEGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) permitted claimant Vinod Haribhau Khekade to withdraw compensation awarded in a motor accident case, but in a phased manner rather than in full. Khekade, who sustained 50% permanent disability in a 2015 accident, was awarded Rs. 26,65,000 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in 2023. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% on undertaking and 25% on surety with accrued interest, balancing the claimant's financial needs against the insurance company's appeal challenging the award as exorbitant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
—
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/1551/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) permitted claimant Vinod Haribhau Khekade to withdraw compensation awarded in a motor accident case, but in a phased manner rather than in full. Khekade, who sustained 50% permanent disability in a 2015 accident, was awarded Rs. 26,65,000 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in 2023. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% on undertaking and 25% on surety with accrued interest, balancing the claimant's financial needs against the insurance company's appeal challenging the award as exorbitant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts