ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, VILLAGE GADEGAON, THR. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY vs SUNIL TUKARAM SARVE Advocate - FEROZ ISMAIL KHAN, ,PRANAY PRAVIN TELANG,CHANDRAKANT B. BAILMARE,(FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/3024/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040113872026

Filing Number

WP/7777/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3024/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, VILLAGE GADEGAON, THR. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

    Adv. HITESH N. VERMA,HARSHITA H. VERMA,HARSHITA H. VERMA, ,HARSHITA H. VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL TUKARAM SARVE Advocate - FEROZ ISMAIL KHAN, ,PRANAY PRAVIN TELANG,CHANDRAKANT B. BAILMARE,(FOR RESPONDENT)

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission-Labour And Industrial

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    Summary: In Writ Petition No. 3024 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), the court issued notice for final disposal to the respondent, returnable after two weeks. The petitioner (Ashok Leyland Limited) was permitted to serve the respondent through both private and regular modes of service, including service on the respondent's advocate before the labour court, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3024/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Writ Petition No. 3024 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), the court issued notice for final disposal to the respondent, returnable after two weeks. The petitioner (Ashok Leyland Limited) was permitted to serve the respondent through both private and regular modes of service, including service on the respondent's advocate before the labour court, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case