ANKITA W/O. MANOJ BODELE vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS GENERAL MANAGER, PUNE — WP/2803/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040113812026
Filing Number
WP/7771/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/2803/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Category
SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )
Sub-Category
RECRUITMENT COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANKITA W/O. MANOJ BODELE
Adv. SUKSHMALATA S. DHONE
Respondent(s)
-
1.BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS GENERAL MANAGER, PUNE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
—
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The Nagpur High Court directed Bank of Maharashtra to decide the petitioner's application for compassionate ground appointment (filed on 29/10/2025) within eight weeks and communicate the decision within two weeks thereafter. The petitioner, sister of a deceased bank employee, had been seeking appointment on compassionate grounds since her brother's death in March 2020, and the bank had not yet decided her representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2803/2026
The Nagpur High Court directed Bank of Maharashtra to decide the petitioner's application for compassionate ground appointment (filed on 29/10/2025) within eight weeks and communicate the decision within two weeks thereafter. The petitioner, sister of a deceased bank employee, had been seeking appointment on compassionate grounds since her brother's death in March 2020, and the bank had not yet decided her representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts