SANTOSH SHANKAR NALLI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2330/2025

Case under The Maharshtra Administrative Tribunal Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040113712025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

13th May 2025

Filing Number

WP/8321/2025

Filing Date

07-04-2025

Registration No

WP/2330/2025

Registration Date

28-04-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

The Maharshtra Administrative Tribunal Section 226,227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

SANTOSH SHANKAR NALLI

Adv. VIJAY N. MORANDE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.

THE COLLECTOR GADCHIROLI

SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT, GADCHIROLI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

13-05-2025
04-09-2025

CONTINUE ADMISSION MATTERS

19-08-2025

FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

21-07-2025

FOR ADMISSION - (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

30-06-2025

FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Santosh Shankar Nalli against the State of Maharashtra and others as infructuous on 17th April, 2026, finding that nothing survived in the petition to warrant further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Santosh Shankar Nalli against the State of Maharashtra and others as infructuous on 17th April, 2026, finding that nothing survived in the petition to warrant further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case