RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NAGPUR DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NAGPUR vs SHRI DINESH S/O BADRIPRASAD SHAHU AND ANOTHER — CAF/1569/2026

Case under Other Act Section 99. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040113622026

Filing Number

CAF/7759/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CAF/1569/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 99

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NAGPUR DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NAGPUR

    Adv. DINKAR NILKANTH KUKDAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI DINESH S/O BADRIPRASAD SHAHU AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF

    The Nagpur High Court permitted Reliance General Insurance to add the legal heirs of deceased respondent Dinesh Shahu to the ongoing First Appeal after finding the cause of action survives death. The insurance company subsequently withdrew its appeal, and the court ordered refund of court fees and disbursement of compensation with accrued interest to respondents, while placing the minor respondent's compensation share in an FDR until majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    —

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/1569/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur High Court permitted Reliance General Insurance to add the legal heirs of deceased respondent Dinesh Shahu to the ongoing First Appeal after finding the cause of action survives death. The insurance company subsequently withdrew its appeal, and the court ordered refund of court fees and disbursement of compensation with accrued interest to respondents, while placing the minor respondent's compensation share in an FDR until majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case