HAMEED YAKUB ISANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS CITY, PUSAD, DIST. YAVATMAL — ABA/242/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040113092026
Filing Number
ABA/3582/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
ABA/242/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HAMEED YAKUB ISANI
Adv. SHYAMSUNDAR AJAY MOHTA,SANDEEP BAMNOTE,SANDEEP BAMNOTE, ,SANDEEP BAMNOTE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) CITY, PUSAD, DIST. YAVATMAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed Hameed Yakub Isani's anticipatory bail application in a case involving contraband tobacco and pan masala (worth ₹2,96,000) found during a raid on his godown. The court granted bail on ₹25,000 PR bond with one surety, noting that the charge-sheet was already filed, the applicant cooperated with police, and the prosecution failed to establish clear ownership of the godown, finding only that he managed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Orders (Fresh) (Criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/242/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed Hameed Yakub Isani's anticipatory bail application in a case involving contraband tobacco and pan masala (worth ₹2,96,000) found during a raid on his godown. The court granted bail on ₹25,000 PR bond with one surety, noting that the charge-sheet was already filed, the applicant cooperated with police, and the prosecution failed to establish clear ownership of the godown, finding only that he managed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts