HAMEED YAKUB ISANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS CITY, PUSAD, DIST. YAVATMAL — ABA/242/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040113092026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

ABA/3582/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

ABA/242/2026

Registration Date

01-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123,223,274,275
Food Safety and Standards Act Section 26(1),26(2)(iv),27(3)(e),30(2)(a),59

Petitioner(s)

HAMEED YAKUB ISANI

Adv. SHYAMSUNDAR AJAY MOHTA,SANDEEP BAMNOTE,SANDEEP BAMNOTE, ,SANDEEP BAMNOTE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) CITY, PUSAD, DIST. YAVATMAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS

02-04-2026
15-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (FRESH) (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed Hameed Yakub Isani's anticipatory bail application in a case involving contraband tobacco and pan masala (worth ₹2,96,000) found during a raid on his godown. The court granted bail on ₹25,000 PR bond with one surety, noting that the charge-sheet was already filed, the applicant cooperated with police, and the prosecution failed to establish clear ownership of the godown, finding only that he managed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed Hameed Yakub Isani's anticipatory bail application in a case involving contraband tobacco and pan masala (worth ₹2,96,000) found during a raid on his godown. The court granted bail on ₹25,000 PR bond with one surety, noting that the charge-sheet was already filed, the applicant cooperated with police, and the prosecution failed to establish clear ownership of the godown, finding only that he managed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case