DIGAMBAR S/O TUKARAM GHOSEKAR AND ANOTHER vs MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP., MUMBAI AND ANR. — WP/2777/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040112282026
Filing Number
WP/7683/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/2777/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIGAMBAR S/O TUKARAM GHOSEKAR AND ANOTHER
Adv. VIKRANT PANDEY,(APPOINTED), (APPOINTED)
-
2.SURESH S/O NARHARI HARAMKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP., MUMBAI AND ANR.
-
2.DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP., AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission-Service Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Summary: The Writ Petition (WP No. 2777 of 2026) filed by Digambar S/o Tukaram Ghosekar against the Managing Director, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 17/06/2026, and petitioners are permitted to serve respondents by private mode in addition to regular service. Petitioners must file an affidavit by the next date or deposit ₹500 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2777/2026
Summary: The Writ Petition (WP No. 2777 of 2026) filed by Digambar S/o Tukaram Ghosekar against the Managing Director, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 17/06/2026, and petitioners are permitted to serve respondents by private mode in addition to regular service. Petitioners must file an affidavit by the next date or deposit ₹500 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts