DIGAMBAR S/O TUKARAM GHOSEKAR AND ANOTHER vs MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP., MUMBAI AND ANR. — WP/2777/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040112282026

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/7683/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP/2777/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Service Matter
State Road Transport Corporation (Amendment) Rules (Maharashtra)

Petitioner(s)

DIGAMBAR S/O TUKARAM GHOSEKAR AND ANOTHER

Adv. VIKRANT PANDEY,(APPOINTED), (APPOINTED)

SURESH S/O NARHARI HARAMKAR

Respondent(s)

MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP., MUMBAI AND ANR.

DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP., AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

18-04-2026
17-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION-SERVICE MATTERS

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Summary: The Writ Petition (WP No. 2777 of 2026) filed by Digambar S/o Tukaram Ghosekar against the Managing Director, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 17/06/2026, and petitioners are permitted to serve respondents by private mode in addition to regular service. Petitioners must file an affidavit by the next date or deposit ₹500 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Writ Petition (WP No. 2777 of 2026) filed by Digambar S/o Tukaram Ghosekar against the Managing Director, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 17/06/2026, and petitioners are permitted to serve respondents by private mode in addition to regular service. Petitioners must file an affidavit by the next date or deposit ₹500 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case