SHRI. KUSHKUMAR MONAHJI SHUKLA, THR. P.O.A., PRAMOD S/O MAROTITAO WALMANDRE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY. REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2779/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040111292026
Filing Number
WP/7622/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/2779/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI. KUSHKUMAR MONAHJI SHUKLA, THR. P.O.A., PRAMOD S/O MAROTITAO WALMANDRE
Adv. VIRAT SURENDRA MISHRA, GAURAVI MISHRA,SACHIN P. AGRAWAL,KABIR RAJ JHAMB
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY. REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR
-
3.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NAGPUR
-
4.CITY SURVEY OFFICE NO. 3, NAGPUR
-
5.TAHSILDAR, NAGPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
—
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Kushkumar Monahji Shukla against the State of Maharashtra as withdrawn on 17th April 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach competent superior authorities for redressal of grievances, and no costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2779/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Kushkumar Monahji Shukla against the State of Maharashtra as withdrawn on 17th April 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach competent superior authorities for redressal of grievances, and no costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts