SHRI. KUSHKUMAR MONAHJI SHUKLA, THR. P.O.A., PRAMOD S/O MAROTITAO WALMANDRE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY. REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2779/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040111292026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/7622/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP/2779/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966

Petitioner(s)

SHRI. KUSHKUMAR MONAHJI SHUKLA, THR. P.O.A., PRAMOD S/O MAROTITAO WALMANDRE

Adv. VIRAT SURENDRA MISHRA, GAURAVI MISHRA,SACHIN P. AGRAWAL,KABIR RAJ JHAMB

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY. REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NAGPUR

CITY SURVEY OFFICE NO. 3, NAGPUR

TAHSILDAR, NAGPUR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

18-04-2026

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Kushkumar Monahji Shukla against the State of Maharashtra as withdrawn on 17th April 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach competent superior authorities for redressal of grievances, and no costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Kushkumar Monahji Shukla against the State of Maharashtra as withdrawn on 17th April 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach competent superior authorities for redressal of grievances, and no costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case